Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Mar 2002 01:29:57 -0500
From:      Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net>
To:        Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1017383026.84300b@mired.org>
Cc:        fcash@lug.kamloops.net, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Submitting new ports
Message-ID:  <20020324062957.GA72651@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
In-Reply-To: <15517.28913.493320.455658@guru.mired.org>
References:  <E16osfB-0000E0-00@lug.kamloops.net> <15517.28913.493320.455658@guru.mired.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:23:45AM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
>In the future, you can get better response in general by noting that
>there's a patch included with [PATCH] at the start of the
>synopsis. Similarly, new ports get quicker treatment if you say New
>port <blah> - ... so that committers know it's a new port just by
>looking at the synopsis.
And please put the category/portname on all PRs. I'm not a committer,
but I get -ports@ and it helps to determine whether I have a reason to
read a particular PR. E.g., is it about one of my ports?

-- 
AlanE
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020324062957.GA72651>