Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 15:12:35 -0800 (PST) From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com> To: stefan@exis.net Cc: jdd@vbc.net, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, chad@gaianet.net, isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Decision in Router Purchase Message-ID: <199611142312.PAA04622@chimp.jnx.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.961114181707.1764F-100000@tarpon.exis.net> (message from Stefan Molnar on Thu, 14 Nov 1996 18:24:12 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That is why we are using it. For us it is very coast effective. To handle it we are getting some 100MB ports for the eth switches. Even with the two the Ts, the CPU was at 90%. That just purely sucks. Depending on the router and the configuration, that might be misconfiguration... And note that there isn't loads of extra CPU in the box -- it's not trying to run a full blown OS plus application programs. Tony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611142312.PAA04622>