Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 20:56:25 +0100 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu, peter@grendel.IAEhv.nl, mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Subject: Re: Correct way to chroot for shell account users? Message-ID: <l03020900afb38f29f0df@[194.32.164.2]> In-Reply-To: <E0wX6vy-0002fp-00@rover.village.org> References: Your message of "Thu, 29 May 1997 07:56:26 PDT." <199705291456.HAA03526@phaeton.artisoft.com> <199705291456.HAA03526@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm sure I'm being desperately naive here, but isn't it sufficient for safety to make chroot(2) a successful no-op unless / is really / (ie the process isn't chrooted already)? -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03020900afb38f29f0df>