Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      29 Aug 2002 15:37:33 -0400
From:      "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
To:        "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de>
Cc:        mipam@ibb.net, Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de>, Stefan =?iso-8859-1?q?Kr=FCger?= <skrueger@europe.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, tech-security@netbsd.org, misc@openbsd.org
Subject:   Re: 1024 bit key considered insecure (sshd)
Message-ID:  <87adn5zcaq.fsf@snark.piermont.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020829183858.A68055@mail.webmonster.de>
References:  <20020828200748.90964.qmail@mail.com> <3D6D3953.6090005@mukappabeta.de> <20020828224330.GE249@localhost> <87k7mamc2s.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <20020829091232.A53344@mail.webmonster.de> <87bs7ln66u.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <20020829155118.B63360@mail.webmonster.de> <871y8hn43d.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <20020829183858.A68055@mail.webmonster.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

"Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> writes:
> Perry E. Metzger(perry@piermont.com)@2002.08.29 10:15:34 +0000:
> > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> writes:
> > > tracking the evolution of computing machinery nowadays, implementing
> > > cryptanalysis in hardware becomes cheaper and faster at an amazing
> > > speed. my wild guess is, that through the upcoming broad availability of
> > > software programmable hardware that is available today, attacks to
> > > crypto in general will become very cheap in a timeframe of months.
> > 
> > If you can attack 1024 bit keys cheaply a few months from now, please
> > let us know. Where I live, Moore's law still observes things double
> > every 18 months, not every 18 hours.
> 
> http://rcc.lanl.gov/index.php as a starting point. screw moores law, if
> the problem can be parallelized. ;-)

Gee, THAT is a really useful idea. Why, I bet that Xilinx will sell me
FPGAs for free! That way if I want to buy ten times more, it won't
cost me ten times as much! And I bet no one thought of that idea
before -- why, I bet when people came up with estimates for the price
of a piece of hardware to execute djb's algorithms they never thought
of parallel processing at all.


Perry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87adn5zcaq.fsf>