Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:24:17 +0400
From:      Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
To:        jhell <jhell@DataIX.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: General note on rc scripts and daemonizing
Message-ID:  <868w59fmdq.fsf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007172358320.91719@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> (jhell@dataix.net's message of "Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:02:09 -0400")
References:  <20100717105658.GV1742@hoeg.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007171823210.26551@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007172358320.91719@pragry.qngnvk.ybpny>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> writes:

> Also another use with the case above. Running top(1) instead of su(1)
> you should see the same symptoms.
>

Use `-f' option in daemon(8). Otherwise it'd still spam to tty.

  $ daemon top
  $ procstat -f $(pgrep top)
    PID COMM               FD T V FLAGS    REF  OFFSET PRO NAME
  36719 top               cwd v d --------   -       - -   /home/blah
  36719 top              root v d --------   -       - -   /
  36719 top                 0 v c rw------   9  686053 -   /dev/pts/3
  36719 top                 1 v c rw------   9  686053 -   /dev/pts/3
  36719 top                 2 v c rw------   9  686053 -   /dev/pts/3
  36719 top                 3 v c r-------   1       0 -   /dev/null
  36719 top                 4 v c r-------   1       0 -   /dev/null

> I should probably also state that using the -f flag to ssh(1) without
> daemon(1) does not exhibit any of these symptoms.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868w59fmdq.fsf>