Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:33:44 -0800
From:      "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
To:        "Dmitry Marakasov" <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>
Cc:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, FreeBSD Ports Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles
Message-ID:  <7d6fde3d0812131133g3956eea7n6830eefde3532a4f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081212102905.GC7422@hades.panopticon>
References:  <20081209181354.GB29817@hades.panopticon> <20081209222042.GC29817@hades.panopticon> <8763lsi10m.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <20081210181125.GA86341@hades.panopticon> <87zlj3heor.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <20081210223522.GA6367@hades.panopticon> <87vdtrhb6r.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <20081211082325.GA6167@hades.panopticon> <op.ulz6y1ae9aq2h7@localhost> <20081212102905.GC7422@hades.panopticon>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote:
> * Jeremy Messenger (mezz7@cox.net) wrote:
>
>>> So if I understand correctly, you're proposing to only use dynamic
>>> plist generation for the ports that support it without modification,
>>> i.e. autotools-based?
>>>
>>> My opinion is that we should support the feature for all ports, or don't
>>> support it at all. Only getting rid of ~5k pkg-plists is not a huge
>>> accomplishment considering the mess it causes and I doubt it's worth
>>> the work on adding the feature to port.mk and then rebuilding and
>>> testing all affected ports. Being able to forget about pkg-plists
>>> once and forever however would be a huge accomplishment and if that's
>>> possible it should be done sooner or later.
>>
>> I object on get rid of pkg-plist. I depend on pkg-plist too much. I think
>> it's important for us to keep on track where the files/directories are.
>
> It's useful for me too sometimes, but it's already not 100% reliable,
> as some ports still generate it dynamically, some use PLIST_FILES, some
> use PLIST_SUB so it's not apparent under which path and/or name the file
> mentioned in plist is actually installed.

Getting rid of the plist files will force a major rewrite of
pkg_install. Are you really comfortable doing that :\?
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0812131133g3956eea7n6830eefde3532a4f>