Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:04:43 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XML driver config file to replace LINT Message-ID: <200006301704.LAA42694@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:08:50 %2B0900." <7m1z1fx3ul.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> References: <7m1z1fx3ul.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20000629144257.A23415@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <20000628173457.C51610@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <200006271619.BAA25205@mail.geocities.co.jp> <20000625195803.G470@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> <20000626115008.B462@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <200006280714.BAA03596@harmony.village.org> <395A1950.50ECD8D5@mail.ptd.net> <200006290024.SAA59981@harmony.village.org> <200006291558.JAA34002@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <7m1z1fx3ul.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> Jun Kuriyama writes: : Of course, source tree are for programmers. First thing we should : consider is not to stress programmers for that procedure. Nik's : suggestion is more conceptual one. We need more discussion for this : subject. I think that a large part of my reaction was the part about going out of our way to force this down the throats of the programmers. On relfection, having dozens of mumble.xml files through the tree that the doc project can use would be good. Having it be the only way to have kernel options might be desirable in some ways, ugly in others. If it is one big .xml file, then I'd have to think that that isn't desrable at all. We're trying to get away from that sort of thing. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006301704.LAA42694>