Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:47:44 +0200
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD and iSCSI for disks.
Message-ID:  <grkn8v$end$2@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <2C0AE775-B15B-4B56-A915-6E126F25C8B0@inoc.net>
References:  <p06240800c601785c92da@[128.113.24.47]> <2C0AE775-B15B-4B56-A915-6E126F25C8B0@inoc.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig44ECF0E9E8C2ED92BC8DA58D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Robert Blayzor wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2009, at 5:43 PM, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>> Some friends of mine are looking at the new "DroboPro", which makes a
>> lot of disk space available via iSCSI (in addition to firewire 800),
>> and they were wondering how well iSCSI works with FreeBSD.  I haven't
>> paid attention to iSCSI support.  Is there anyone using it heavily
>> for disk-storage under FreeBSD?  Has there been much changed for
>> iSCSI support in the 8.x branch, or is 7.x support working fine?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> If you're looking for "production ready" iSCSI initiator support in
> FreeBSD, do yourself a favor, save some time, and look into something
> else.  Seriously, we went down this road just recently testing both
> FreeBSD 7.0/7.1 amd64 on various Dell servers with Intel (em) Gig-E
> NIC's and it was very easy to basically get the box to lock up solid
> and/or panic.  Our targets were both Netapp and Equallogic iSCSI SAN's.=
=20
> We didn't have a lot of time to debug it, our setup was pretty simple..=

> yet when we tried to run various simulated real world load on it the
> boxes just caved.  Even with jumbo frames enabled on the NIC's the
> performance was mediocre at best.  Unfortunately due a time constraint
> we had to move the clients to CentOS 5.2/5.3 and things have been very
> good so far.  I was hoping that FreeBSD's iSCSI support was a bit more
> solid, or at least hoping that the (isp) driver had support for the
> QLogic iSCSI HBA's...  no luck.

I have a feeling this is because the ISCSI initiator in FreeBSD hasn't
been updated since 2007. There have been patches and new development but
nothing committed and/or MFC-ed.

I'm just starting to evaluate it, so I can't say anything about its
stability yet.


--------------enig44ECF0E9E8C2ED92BC8DA58D
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJ3eBgldnAQVacBcgRAr7CAJ9jxfzTivXyXPDbco/Cex/OAvng/QCdEyEv
CLCPUMOVCwz/n0YI1ascJVU=
=olFs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig44ECF0E9E8C2ED92BC8DA58D--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?grkn8v$end$2>