Date: 28 May 1998 18:26:31 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) Cc: Al Reuben <alex@nac.net>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/6774: bind(3)/libc improvement Message-ID: <xzpemxecqfc.fsf@gjallarhorn.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk's message of "Thu, 28 May 1998 16:59:12 %2B0100" References: <E0yf55E-0002Fn-00@oak66.doc.ic.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) writes: > On May 28, 4:33pm, Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote: > } Subject: Re: kern/6774: bind(3)/libc improvement > > Al Reuben <alex@nac.net> writes: > > > > > What I propose is an enviornment variable, "LOCAL_BIND" which > > > > > would be used by the bind(3) code. If this does not exist, the > > > Err, bind 8 does what you are both talking about: > > Doh. We're talking about bind(3), not bind(8) - which, to add to the > > general confusion, is not necessarily bind 8, but can be e.g. bind 4 > > :) > To be absolutely clear, we are talking about bind(2), and not Oops, it's in section 2? I thought it was in 3... kick me for not checking :) -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpemxecqfc.fsf>