Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:25:42 +0900 From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@geocities.co.jp> To: papalia@udel.edu Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docbook4.1? Message-ID: <200008291545.AAA27952@mail.geocities.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20000828090509.00ad6200@mail.udel.edu> References: <4.3.1.2.20000828090509.00ad6200@mail.udel.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John <papalia@udel.edu> wrote in <4.3.1.2.20000828090509.00ad6200@mail.udel.edu>: > I was just checking the up-to-dateness of my ports, and I realized that > docbook-1.1, 2.41, 3.0, and 3.1 are all installed - i'm assuming that this > was either accomplished directly by or by dependencies from the docproj > metaport? I was wondering if those could all be uninstalled and replaced > simply by docbook-4.1 and still have everything work right for doing > documentation and tagging? In short, a version of DocBook DTD has nothing to do with another version of the DTD. Of course, there are some compatibility between two versions of the DTD, but it is not expected. So, it is right that you have some version of the DTD at the same time, and you need DocBook-3.1 at least because most of FDP docs written in SGML now need it. Docproj metaport will install docbook-2.4.1/3.0/3.1/4.0/4.1. -- | Hiroki Sato | sato@sekine00.ee.noda.sut.ac.jp (UNIV) | | hrs@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD Project) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008291545.AAA27952>