Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:57:25 -0500 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean Message-ID: <200611290957.26508@aldan> In-Reply-To: <20061129230636.aef46d92.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <20061127222709.aa35ab22.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200611271114.42304@aldan> <20061129230636.aef46d92.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 09:06, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: = > but library may also be not using threads _at all_. -lm, for example, is = > happily used by many threaded programs without itself being thread-aware. = = ššššššššI understand your ideal, think so too. šHowever, in fact, it is = ššššššššunrealistic environment:-(. Norikatsu, this is not some unreachable ideal (libm is not). If no application is calling into a library from multiple threads in parallel, that library need not be thread-aware. You are (slightly) pessimizing your installation by building a thread-aware ICU without having a need for it... -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611290957.26508>