Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:19:41 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb -U fails Message-ID: <20040202211941.GC90670@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040202204500.GA82776@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> References: <20040130195143.GA93830@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> <20040201212348.GA24109@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040202075512.GA54021@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> <200402020227.32815.kstewart@owt.com> <20040202204500.GA82776@seatle.vredesdorp.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:45:00PM +0100, r t g tan wrote: > > Then why not quit banging you head on a wall and use "make index". Your= =20 > > failure to adapt is spamming the list. Portsdb -U has not produced=20 > > totally clean INDEX runs since I can remember. Make index, on the other= =20 > > hand, is currently producing clean makes. > >=20 > > There are times when one doesn't work and the other does. You just have= =20 > > to not refuse anything but ports/INDEX. > >=20 > > Kent > >=20 > > --=20 > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > >=20 > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html >=20 > make index fails as well with a bunch of make_index: no entrie messages. >=20 > I guess Ill leave it at this waiting for it to get fixed. It's not broken. Please reread earlier advice given to you. Kris --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAHr7tWry0BWjoQKURAudhAKCZH6bujqrX9eWbpa3I2Y8SkNAm8gCdHWEl bLTmw1i11AQVTRylroC6LrQ= =GYHX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040202211941.GC90670>