Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:50:56 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Going Dynamic (Was: HEADS UP: new NSS) Message-ID: <3EA42F80.5020504@acm.org> References: <20030417141133.GA4155@madman.celabo.org> <20030417144449.GA4530@madman.celabo.org> <200304171535.h3HFZEFs094589@strings.polstra.com> <20030418014500.B94094@iclub.nsu.ru> <200304171944.h3HJi1jK095151@strings.polstra.com> <3E9F0A28.8030906@btc.adaptec.com> <3E9F1C15.7080702@acm.org> <20030417221622.GA18079@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> <3EA0A4E3.6090801@acm.org> <20030420071000.GA44409@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: > [/rescue] should be "/stand". We have a long history of putting > emergency, statically compiled programs there. Hmmm... Just noticed that /stand can easily break on an installed system, since it relies on /bin/sh. I wouldn't rely on it _too_ heavily for system recovery. ;-) (During installation, /bin/sh is symlinked to /stand/sh, but that symlink doesn't exist on an installed system, for the obvious reasons.) Tim Kientzle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EA42F80.5020504>