Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 02:24:51 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising <zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se> To: Vladimir Kondratyev <vladimir@kondratyev.su>, =?UTF-8?B?6JeN5oy655GL?= <lantw44@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which should be used, devel/evdev-proto or /usr/include/dev/evdev? Message-ID: <5752aa68-8f9c-2d10-3a7e-c489760b827d@daemonic.se> In-Reply-To: <a01876f8a3b81f93cd8e77b61a367efd@kondratyev.su> References: <86a3cf16-6206-2a5c-141b-7bfffbd7402f@gmail.com> <a01876f8a3b81f93cd8e77b61a367efd@kondratyev.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/19/19 11:34 PM, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > On 2019-03-19 19:53, =E8=97=8D=E6=8C=BA=E7=91=8B wrote: >> I found evdev-proto, which includes linux/input.h, was added a few >> months ago. It seems that many ports has been gradually switched to us= e >> it after it was added. > Really, all these ports always had indirect dependency on linux/input.h= via > RUN_DEPENDS=3Dmultimedia/vl4_compat in libevdev or webcamd Makefile. >=20 Just a quick note, evdev-proto was split off from v4l_compat, so ports=20 that previously used v4l_compat for linux/input.h should use evdev-proto=20 instead. Regards --=20 Niclas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5752aa68-8f9c-2d10-3a7e-c489760b827d>