Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:51:10 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, davidxu@freebsd.org, toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast sigblock (AKA rtld speedup) Message-ID: <20130113135110.GS2561@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20130113133159.GA72462@stack.nl> References: <20130107182235.GA65279@kib.kiev.ua> <20130111095459.GZ2561@kib.kiev.ua> <50EFE830.3030500@freebsd.org> <20130111204938.GD2561@kib.kiev.ua> <20130111232906.GA29017@stack.nl> <20130112053147.GH2561@kib.kiev.ua> <20130112162547.GA54954@stack.nl> <20130113133159.GA72462@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uc+LCsvbRhlIZa01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 02:32:00PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 05:25:47PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > This suggests a different rather simpler change. Libthr can always use > > its rtld lock implementation instead of only when multiple threads > > exist. This avoids the sigprocmask() syscalls and should not be much > > slower than the default implementation in rtld because that also > > contains atomic operations (both the unpatched and the patched version). > > People that care about performance of exceptions can then link in libthr > > (in many cases, it is already linked in to allow for (the possibility > > of) threading). >=20 > > I have tested this and exceptions were indeed more than twice as fast in > > my test program if I created an extra thread doing nothing than in the > > fully single-threaded version (with or without libthr). >=20 > Here is a patch. It is lightly tested. >=20 > The function _thr_rtld_fini() can be removed afterwards because it is no > longer used. >=20 > Index: lib/libthr/thread/thr_init.c > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- lib/libthr/thread/thr_init.c (revision 244639) > +++ lib/libthr/thread/thr_init.c (working copy) > @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ > _thr_signal_init(); > if (_thread_event_mask & TD_CREATE) > _thr_report_creation(curthread, curthread); > + _thr_rtld_init(); Please add a comment there, describing the reason for initializing threaded rtld locks. > } > } > =20 > Index: lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c (revision 244639) > +++ lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c (working copy) > @@ -57,11 +57,6 @@ > return (0); > =20 > __isthreaded =3D threaded; > - if (threaded !=3D 0) { > - _thr_rtld_init(); > - } else { > - _thr_rtld_fini(); > - } > return (0); > } I do not object. --uc+LCsvbRhlIZa01 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ8rvNAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1B2cgP/3syRxWJGr+UxICBCFjzuzTf qNJAC8zs4/ZaGLOaH3iRlQ13OnaR5JPq2PTIr5tImuy9f5/ixW0APcSfVq0fBUkF 68ZmPS7ACXvbclkJKVDJE0vazD+vrQ48Tl2KzeHX7ELVYaJI2yzAr7l/wF+z+Dmh GQu/rTS0J/uxjdSXnBwo53oIM2+boab+333Gvz5eUAY1xabPZBnlCoHqf6lhtFcy bIxVmQYRLix3kbRAyXCOtQvCOfKDSFyV7bi8E5UUSPjigXWSjCWXlzKaKT5xsbK1 tOyKFPObOte1GYkhj9nXe+fukImAsgUUeJlP6+42xGPajMhM41IVog8U6wuIjOB9 6VaXc8U1tr+r9zL4uWD/MW7cIThv/VL3Id8N+A1roIxvB/axJrMx7noGA/r/+89k f6zm4BxymXv100tZ7u7bT8VIDjkp4fpQXZCRdC9Qoqvi7UcfhJ7gxKUbbbOQf5Uo 893ysPRxW7oQpSgYiFyrrYTFL1e5mCEqVzO8PKuEv6BS5tuuPdeK1uRlRKTKrfW0 V1lBTFv7JehlLW6gYqmFyokDdbO/6zQmnUMeQIjtYfX+0xIq8UgiODBn8TsqzqlL F6afbDI+d8/2RrSm0vajSzYYPRoXjkbRwfLHEQ3Lbm1oiH7ifnKv3/3pNUMVACDW 0BKhbXfXmfIK78knovi5 =006m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uc+LCsvbRhlIZa01--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130113135110.GS2561>