Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 10:22:03 -0500 From: dannyman <dannyman@dannyland.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New ports scheme Message-ID: <19980702102203.B1763@enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980701221950.27951A-100000@altrox.atipa.com>; from Atipa on Wed, Jul 01, 1998 at 10:29:25PM -0600 References: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980701231028.26909A-100000@hobbes.saturn-tech.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980701221950.27951A-100000@altrox.atipa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ermm ... if we're going to muck with the ports directory structure anyway, maybe we might consider having more than one directory level? like net/irc/bitchx, net/ftp/ncftp3, etc ... ? As an example of how ugly things get when you have a limited directory structure, check out the several gigabytes on Aminet organized two trees deep ... :/ -- // dannyman yori aiokomete || Our Honored Symbol deserves \\/ http://www.dannyland.org/~dannyman/ || an Honorable Retirement (UIUC) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980702102203.B1763>