Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 15:07:26 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@freebie.dcfinc.com> To: tweten@frihet.com Cc: pst@juniper.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MFS in -stable? Message-ID: <199804132207.PAA04585@freebie.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <199804120107.SAA11809@ns.frihet.com> from "David E. Tweten" at "Apr 11, 98 06:07:14 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It _is_ a bit of a hack. I don't believe anybody has done anything > significant to it since the current encarnation arrived as part of 4.4 > BSD, which means it still runs at half the speed it could, worries > about cylinder groups, and pays no attention to locality of reference > in virtual memory. Still, half memory speed is a _lot_ faster than > any disk, and it has always been rock reliable for me. But if you left the memory available for Kernel buffers, wouldn't you get the performance without the management headaches? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) Brother, can you paradigm? 602-953-1392 chad@dcfinc.com chad@anasazi.com larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804132207.PAA04585>