Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:03:38 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Michael Sierchio <ducatista@camber-thrust.net> Cc: lioux@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: qmail-1.03_3 Message-ID: <m3sm4opi45.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <41F72C02.7060901@camber-thrust.net> (Michael Sierchio's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:34:58 -0800") References: <41F6F431.6060005@tenebras.com> <1106704507.16118.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <41F72C02.7060901@camber-thrust.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Sierchio <ducatista@camber-thrust.net> writes: > only a perceived bug because of a lack of understanding of how > operators are evaluated. Are you talking to your mirror image? If not, please do. > 4) Add qmail's sendmail emulation fix: "David Phillips noticed that > sendmail's '-f' option sets a default From: header, and so should > qmail's emulation." > - Add distinfo checksum for the patch > > This is also bogus, IMO -- feature addition to software which has been > well-audited and which makes security claims is simply a bad idea. Well-audited? The audit doesn't mean anything if the author doesn't get to address the dozens of bugs that are revealed in that process and so are still in the most current version, 1.03. Either you can point to a bug with the patch or you shut up. Today. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3sm4opi45.fsf>