Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 12:47:43 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_ethersubr.c src/sys/netinet ip_dummynet.c ip_dummynet.h Message-ID: <12788.1021286863@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 May 2002 03:46:03 PDT." <20020513034603.A30586@iguana.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20020513034603.A30586@iguana.icir.org>, Luigi Rizzo writes: >On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:38:32PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> Isn't it about time we go to multiple chains of rules ? > >To some degree, yes. >And the option i am mentioning seems to me the easiest way to get >to this without breaking backward compatibility. >People have complex rulesets based on the existing structure, >and I'd rather not screwup their ruleset completely. But couldn't you easily add a new rulechain for the ethernet rules ? That seems both clean and simple to me ? Besides, if we want to clean up, 5.0 is the time to do it... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12788.1021286863>