Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:16:34 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: netstat wierdness? Message-ID: <45F706A2.5020106@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <86r6rt6z27.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <45F388D4.2080900@elischer.org> <45F45172.8070601@elischer.org> <86r6rt6z27.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes: >> answering myself.. >> comes from having options LOCK_PROFILING in my kernel. >> adding the same to /etc/make.conf and recompiling netstat and libkvm helped. >> (not sure if both are needed) > > This is very bad. LOCK_PROFILING should have no visible effect on > userland. That is precisely what xinpcb, xunpcb, xtcpcb etc. are for: > to isolate userland from kernel structures. They should not contain > any locks or anything else which would be affected by LOCK_PROFILING > or other kernel options. > > DES sockstat actually told me that all those were the wrong size, so apparently they change size too.(!?) I haven't gone to look at their definition yet, but as you say, it sounds like something was done wrong.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45F706A2.5020106>