Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:33:11 -0800
From:      Erich Weiler <weiler@soe.ucsc.edu>
To:        Jason Wolfe <nitroboost@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
Subject:   Re: Arg. TCP slow start killing me.
Message-ID:  <4EC061C7.1040406@soe.ucsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4EC05F58.1050103@soe.ucsc.edu>
References:  <4EC033B7.5080609@soe.ucsc.edu> <4EC0395C.3030302@swin.edu.au> <4EC055CB.40100@soe.ucsc.edu> <4EC0585F.5000104@soe.ucsc.edu> <CAAAm0r0TO5ifZ_-s%2BJEN5jwRNuZQq=8t6zRRKSnfPBTO2Rb%2Bng@mail.gmail.com> <4EC05F58.1050103@soe.ucsc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Actually, another question might be:  How can I prove that my firewall 
really is dropping packets in transit, as it forwards them on?  Is there 
some sysctl oid that would show dropped packets, so some netstat counter 
I can look at?

On 11/13/11 4:22 PM, Erich Weiler wrote:
>> Yeah, skimming fail, I didn't realize the machine was not the
>> termination point of your connections. I do have patches back ported
>> that would likely get the modular congestion control working on 8.1,
>> but neither my suggestions nor the implementation of Cubic will help
>> much as mentioned.
>
> Given that my firewall is simply forwarding packets in and out, and is
> not an endpoint, does anyone think tuning up buffers would help here? If
> so, which buffers/sysctl parameters would be worth trying?
>
> Thanks for the help everyone!
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EC061C7.1040406>