Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:52:00 +0100
From:      Davide D'Amico <davide.damico@contactlab.com>
To:        Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreBSD 9.1 and ZFS v28 performances
Message-ID:  <bbb8fd8ad189ecc1cc0347b81b131eee@sys.tomatointeractive.it>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.2.01.1303192036240.11141@freddy.simplesystems.org>
References:  <514729BD.2000608@contactlab.com> <810E5C08C2D149DBAC94E30678234995@multiplay.co.uk> <51473D1D.3050306@contactlab.com> <1DD6360145924BE0ABF2D0979287F5F4@multiplay.co.uk> <51474F2F.5040003@contactlab.com> <E106A7DB08744581A08C610BD8A86560@multiplay.co.uk> <51475267.1050204@contactlab.com> <514757DD.9030705@contactlab.com> <A9C89C979F8D4CBABE73256A1C66E95D@multiplay.co.uk> <alpine.GSO.2.01.1303192036240.11141@freddy.simplesystems.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Il 20.03.2013 02:37 Bob Friesenhahn ha scritto:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> 
>> Oh and another thing if this is mysql did you set the right settings
>> for your ZFS volume e.g.
>> zfs set atime=off tank
>> zfs create tank/mysql
>> zfs set recordsize=16k tank/mysql
> 
> Very importantly, the recordsize should be set before first creating
> the database file.  The recordsize becomes a property of the file.
> Even if one sets it to 16k, the file will continue to use 128k if that
> was the setting when it was created.


To recap, a collegue of mine was able to reach the same performances of 
UFS using a lot of *magic* knobs or sysctls such as 
vfs.zfs.txg.{synctime,timeout}, vfs.zfs.write_limit_override, 
txg.write_limit_override and vfs.zfs.zil_disable=0.

So, the lesson for me is: with my hardware (R720 12core, 32GB ram), 
with my raid/disks setup, with the software I have to use 
(mysql-5.6.10-ent), with the dataset/payload I have to use I think I'll 
use UFS (I have a lot of other dbserver using UFS) or (but I will know 
this only tomorrow) I'll test CentOS on the same hardware to see how 
does it perform, so I'll post my questions and/or results on 
freebsd-performances ml :)

Thanks,
d.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bbb8fd8ad189ecc1cc0347b81b131eee>