Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 12:28:03 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which egcs port should I use? Message-ID: <19991113122802.E90421@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <19991113172545.A336@frolic.no-support.loc>; from bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE on Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 05:25:45PM %2B0100 References: <19991113030626.A659@frolic.no-support.loc> <19991112211833.A71113@relay.nuxi.com> <19991113172545.A336@frolic.no-support.loc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 05:25:45PM +0100, Bjoern Fischer wrote: > I'd like to know whether the ports behave like the native compiler > in -CURRENT. E.g. now I tell Joe User to use -R/vol/foo/lib for .. > And when we switch to the next FreeBSD brach, I tell him that he > has to use something completely different for the native egcs. I try hard to put most of the FreeBSD extensions into the ports. Especially WRT compiling/linking options and behavior. I believe you'll find that things between 4.0's compiler and the `egcs' port are the same. The biggest difference is the 4.0 native compilers ability to generate a.out binaries. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991113122802.E90421>