Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 21:17:34 +0200 From: Paul van der Zwan <paulz@trantor.xs4all.nl> To: BSD User <bsder@allcaps.org> Cc: Thomas Quinot <quinot@inf.enst.fr>, Paul van der Zwan <paulz@trantor.xs4all.nl>, current@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org, paulz@trantor.xs4all.nl Subject: Re: Multiple NFS server problems with Solaris 8 clients Message-ID: <200110251917.f9PJHZx56036@trantor.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: Message from BSD User <bsder@allcaps.org> of "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:16:08 PDT." <20011025030312.J8642-100000@mail.allcaps.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20011025030312.J8642-100000@mail.allcaps.org>, BSD User wrote= : >Actually, upon instrumenting some code, it looks like RELEASE-4.4 gets i= t >mostly right. It ejects a PROG_UNAVAIL call which causes the Solaris 8 >client to back off. The correct message would seem to be PROC_UNAVAIL, >but I would take PROG_UNAVAIL if I could get -current to eject it. In this case ( the NFS_ACL one) it seems PROG_UNAVAIL is the right thing.= It has a different program number from NFS and it is not just a not imple= mented procedure that is part of NFS. Paul -- = Paul van der Zwan paulz @ trantor.xs4all.nl "I think I'll move to theory, everything works in theory..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110251917.f9PJHZx56036>