Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:09:42 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net netisr.c Message-ID: <200310011709.43024.sam@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031001180240.16031Q-300000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031001180240.16031Q-300000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 03:13 pm, Robert Watson wrote: > (1) Potential lock order interactions. I believe these are OK given the > current model of dropping the driver lock before entering the > interface input routines. However, since the ground doesn't appear to > be firm here quite yet... All drivers I've looked at either drop the lock or mark it recursive so this should not be an issue. If there are any LOR's then they need to be fixed. I would like to see all instances of recursive lock usage removed but that typically requires significant restructuring of the driver. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310011709.43024.sam>