Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 08:16:57 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Richard Seaman, Jr." <dick@tar.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revisitted.. Threads goals.? Message-ID: <199912011516.IAA00286@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <19991201085633.Z29767@tar.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911201834440.6767-100000@current1.whistle.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911292207120.7902-100000@current1.whistle.com> <19991201085633.Z29767@tar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have some thoughts about what it takes to separate the uthread > code from libc, which facitlitates point 1 above, and which also > makes it easier to make libc thread safe for alternative pthreads > implementations (eg. linuxthreads). > > Also, I have some thoughts about how to make libc (and/or libc_r) > more thread safe. > > I'd be happy to jot these down over the next few days and send them > out, if anyone is interested. Count me as one who is interested. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912011516.IAA00286>