Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> To: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ? Message-ID: <20040115155318.GR2221@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:50:49AM -0800, John Kennedy wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > there is no "more or less". there is only one ports tree, and a > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box. >=20 > Read the users email. They're using specific tags, not "." so there are > (or may be) some differences as time elapses. Users should not use tags for ports collection. It's documentated also. -Kirill --QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABrduQC1G6a60JuURApeKAKDPOSNMKy/nP0gOkTBbnkbHb6vp6gCgujuZ lQUGibx0GcpMYCFvnJIeDA8= =M7/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115155318.GR2221>