Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 22:23:04 +0200 From: David Figuera <david.figuera@gmail.com> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about numbers of connections Message-ID: <4A0F20A8.6040200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d353bd50905132048v18f1f1f5jcbed24651da0ce76@mail.gmail.com> References: <d353bd50905130902y1dec556bg6ab13a89cbf0005@mail.gmail.com> <736c47cb0905131752s29a0198xea15a95df7d42e94@mail.gmail.com> <4A0B70D3.3080405@radel.com> <d353bd50905132048v18f1f1f5jcbed24651da0ce76@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Espartano wrote: > Ok, I think that I didn't explain it very well, I donīt have any hight > speed network, I only have used my Alix board at my house, but I > wondering how much work the Alix board could support, more > specifically I wonder if the Alix board could manage about 1 thousand > concurrent connections through a 100Mbps network making round-robin to > load balance and spread the connections between 3 or 4 servers, I > think that the Alix board could do it, It is only a hypothetical case > but I would like to know if I can trust on my Alix board to do this > kind of job or not. If you're thinking about buying an ALIX and you are not sure if it's going to do the trick, well, I'm not very sure, but I think it will work just fine. I have an ALIX 2C3 (Geode LX800 @500MHz) and would make some tests. PS: Are you subscribed to freebsd-es list as well? I think I've seen you there. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoPIKcACgkQsGqVGJtK6HqbtQCgjIYCX8azYviyRTvRNYrObEyY 8lcAnif76j55+5GTtwzVRcc7n/UjhODe =WB// -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A0F20A8.6040200>