Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 17:59:16 -0500 From: Greg Lehey <grog@mojave.sitaranetworks.com> To: Stephen McKay <syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Administrivia: charter clarification question Message-ID: <19991205175916.45672@mojave.sitaranetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <199912041637.CAA03403@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au>; from Stephen McKay on Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 02:37:58AM %2B1000 References: <199912041637.CAA03403@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, 5 December 1999 at 2:37:58 +1000, Stephen McKay wrote: > In response to my recent thread "Tape driver problems" I was advised twice > by a respectable FreeBSD citizen that my posting was misfiled and should > have gone to -current. Quote: > > "If it's -CURRENT, talk about it on -CURRENT. That overrides anything else." > > It is my belief that scsi stuff should be discussed on -scsi no matter > whether it is -current, -stable, or some older release. Am I wrong? > The charter as it stands is rather thin: > >>>>> info freebsd-scsi > FREEBSD-SCSI SCSI subsystem > This is the mailing list for people working on the scsi subsystem > for FreeBSD. > > Please note that this is not a whinge, I am not after ammunition for an > "I told you so", and I'm not going to say who contacted me. I just want > the system to work smoothly. Well, I suppose I must be the "respectable FreeBSD citizen". It looks like my view are pretty much in the minority, so I'll accept the majority view. This doesn't mean I agree: I think you're more likely to get a good response on -CURRENT. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991205175916.45672>