Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:25:06 +0000
From:      Mark R V Murray <mark@grondar.org>
To:        John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r274739 - head/sys/mips/conf
Message-ID:  <AE8F2D30-7F91-4C90-B79A-D99857D8AED8@grondar.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141120084832.GE24601@funkthat.com>
References:  <201411200552.sAK5qnXP063073@svn.freebsd.org> <20141120084832.GE24601@funkthat.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 20 Nov 2014, at 08:48, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote:
>=20
> Should we make random standard now?  We don't live in the 90's =
anymore,
> and a system really can't function w/o randomness anymore=E2=80=A6

There is a case to be made for making it default in all/most kernel
configs.

I disagree on making it compulsory in all cases, as very small embedded
systems can easily argue for not having it.

> I'm fine w/ making the various random mixers options, but the core
> random infrastructure and /dev/u?random should be standard now=E2=80=A6

There is some compulsory infrastructure; this gets you the =E2=80=9Cdummy=E2=
=80=9D
driver which just blocks and never delivers anything.

M
--=20
Mark R V Murray




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AE8F2D30-7F91-4C90-B79A-D99857D8AED8>