Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:29:16 -0800 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>, =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=c3=b8rgra?= =?UTF-8?Q?v?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <56428BDC.1040402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5641D00E.501@digiware.nl> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641BFC4.7050208@digiware.nl> <86a8qm9l9b.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641D00E.501@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/10/15 3:07 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Which when I found out that upstreaming patches from base will be hard, > because the whole logging in the ports version is totally different. No it's not. The HPN patch in the ports version had *extra logging* for a while but that is not the case now. There is nothing different compared to upstream OpenSSH now for logging. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56428BDC.1040402>