Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 May 2005 10:40:00 +0100
From:      Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
To:        Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: boot banner project
Message-ID:  <20050504094000.GA1143@uk.tiscali.com>
In-Reply-To: <17015.43023.924186.422635@roam.psg.com>
References:  <6.1.0.6.2.20050426233321.084e9210@cobalt.antimatter.net> <51899.216.177.243.42.1114584317.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050427001118.0327cd50@cobalt.antimatter.net> <52515.216.177.243.42.1114586501.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <d904a5e7050428062443496e3@mail.gmail.com> <61359.216.177.243.35.1114722481.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050429105416.GA94049@wedge.madpilot.net> <d904a5e705042912342621236b@mail.gmail.com> <20050502195456.GA1226@uk.tiscali.com> <17015.43023.924186.422635@roam.psg.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 06:34:23AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> > One of the reasons I ditched Linux several years ago was the way Linux
> > shifts constantly. A good example is the firewalling code: once upon a
> > time there was ipfw. Then that was replaced by ipfwadm. Then that was
> > discarded, and replaced by ipchains. Which in turn was discarded and
> > replaced by iptables. (Or was that the other way round? I don't follow it
> > closely these days)
> 
> yep.  another way: this sounds as if you see freebsd as a workhorse
> production system as opposed to a hobby where the more of your time
> it absorbs the better it is.

Yes, that's a fair summary. However, historically there was a big up-front
investment in FreeBSD until you get to that point.

I think this is much less so nowadays. In particular, the handbook is
excellent, and a lot of essential utilities which you had to install as
add-ons are now included as standard (e.g. gzip, tar with -z flag)

Now the only essential package to install is a POSIX shell with interactive
command history - i.e. "bash" - and it looks like /bin/sh has now gained
that capability too, although sadly not tab-completion.

It's still fair to say that the tools for [install, upgrade, configure] have
a number of problems, especially for those new to FreeBSD.

Regards,

Brian.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050504094000.GA1143>