Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:28:20 +0200 From: PythonAB <python@rgbaz.eu> To: son goku <ryu.planka@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>, Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk> Subject: Re: source code licensing questions Message-ID: <278C193A-B4D5-456D-8C22-AC0A89D4A486@rgbaz.eu> In-Reply-To: <b5a284500907270542n123a4982t243061156facf57@mail.gmail.com> References: <b5a284500907270158s61e7c668s30a6b6b5eaa0b74e@mail.gmail.com> <20090727110952.GA60932@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4A6D8F5D.7020600@unsane.co.uk> <b5a284500907270542n123a4982t243061156facf57@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 jul 2009, at 14:42, son goku wrote: > Thanks guys for the prompt answers!!! > It seems weird that code that uses dtrace must be opened. I mean every > serious production level application must have some dtrace-like > mechanism > inside to collect online information when needed. It is a shame that > because > of licensing issues, I will have to roll-my-own and re-invent the > wheel all > over again, probably with cruder and implementation that is more > flawed > compared to dtrace. > Why don't you write it and release it under a BSD license? gr Arno
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?278C193A-B4D5-456D-8C22-AC0A89D4A486>