Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 21:15:07 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options. Message-ID: <20030509211507.5b0b54f1.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030508231909.GO609@unixpages.org> References: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030508231909.GO609@unixpages.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 May 2003 01:19:09 +0200 Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:44:07PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > Josh, Lars, > > > > After looking over this a little closer, I'm totally lost at why these > > PRs were filed. > > > > -p is listed in the manual page as a historic and deprecated option. > > -P is listed in the manual page as obsolete. > > > > I can understand removing them both from the usage message, however > > they seem to be documented fine in the manual page (as obsolete). > > > > Currently I have an email in to murray and bmah about this, and > > my personal opinion is that the manual page is fine. > > > > Any opinions on just removing the -P and -p option from the code > > and leaving the manual page as is? What do the other -doc committers > > think about this? > > > > Apparently mbr removed ISO support from the code a while ago (which > didn't work anyway) and these are leftovers. > It's not fatal if this stays in, but as it's something that isn't > even implemented anymore, it would be nice to be thrown out. > Cool, and I talked to bmah about it also. I've got a fairly good idea how I'll handle this. Thanks. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030509211507.5b0b54f1.trhodes>