Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:28:11 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: Christopher Nielsen <cnielsen@pobox.com> Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility Message-ID: <20000425102811.A5689@myhakas.matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004242350090.26269-100000@hayseed.net>; from cnielsen@pobox.com on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 11:56:50PM -0700 References: <20000425094709.A5210@myhakas.matti.ee> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004242350090.26269-100000@hayseed.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 11:56:50PM -0700, Christopher Nielsen <cnielsen@pobox.com> wrote: > Solaris is far and away better at SMP than NT. I haven't seen NT running > on 64-cpu machines, and I certainly haven't seen it scaling very nearly > linearly to ~20 CPUs (diminishing returns start to take effect around 22 > cpus). Solaris has had this since at least 2.6 (when I last evaluated > this) with 2.[78] adding greater stability and more features. You are speaking about SPARC arhitecture, aren't you? Actually we can't compare IA32 and 64-bit SPARC I think and after all I'm absolutely wrong person to discuss about SPARC so I shut up now :-) -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000425102811.A5689>