Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:59:37 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to you Message-ID: <XFMail.20031222175937.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031222225139.GL652@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22-Dec-2003 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:09:06PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >> On 2003.12.22 16:46:32 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> > >> > On 22-Dec-2003 Simon L. Nielsen wrote: >> > > On 2003.12.22 14:36:31 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> > > >> > >> Why does qa get two e-mails with two different lists? >> > > >> > > I think it's because some PR's are assigned to 'qa' and others to >> > > 'freebsd-qa'. >> > >> > Oof. They all list 'qa' as the owner though. >> >> The freebsd- part is stripped from the owner column, but the To field of >> the emails still have the real owner address. >> >> All the PR's assigned to qa should probably be reassigned to freebsd-qa, >> since that seems to be the common form used other places... > > Trivially done, but it will result in 126 mails to the list unless I > lock gnats for a few minutes to do it manually and regenerate the index. > > Preferences? Whatever is easiest for you. Also, send a note to developers@ perhaps stating that freebsd-foo is preferred to foo. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20031222175937.jhb>