Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:06:59 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD/alpha kern.flp flood
Message-ID:  <20030402170659.GA59231@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030402104439.GA26900@sunbay.com>
References:  <20030329190908R.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <3E857E9C.F7476A32@mindspring.com> <20030329203005.GB94956@sunbay.com> <20030331150348.GD21700@sunbay.com> <20030401194712.GA10151@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030402151519.U25349@gamplex.bde.org> <20030402104439.GA26900@sunbay.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:44:39PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Most of the savings from stripping commits is from removing verbose compiler
> > id "GCC: (GNU) 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021119 (release)".
...
> David, can we get rid of the .comment section for the normal
> builds too, or at least not put these long GCC strings into?

"GCC: (GNU) 3.2.1" is the version string that the FSF STRONGLY wants to
remain.  They also strongly push us to add to that string so it is clear
this compiler is a derivative.  Bug reports are also useless with "3.2.1"
and "20021119".



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030402170659.GA59231>