Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:46:30 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        chromium@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 216327] www/chromium: Pulseaudio compiled in by default
Message-ID:  <bug-216327-28929-DGz0PBrgTh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216327-28929@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-216327-28929@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216327

--- Comment #2 from OlivierW <olivierw1+bugzilla-freebsd@hotmail.com> ---
Thanks for your answer.

If we start adding this pulseaudio bloatware as default in ports, it may one
day end in FreeBSD base, that would be very bad.

Pro:
- I admit I don't know of any pro of pulseaudio, it just doesn't work fine =
on
Linux and probably isn't any better on FreeBSD.

Cons:
- I've tried to use pulseaudio on Debian Wheezy and Jessie. Sometimes it br=
eaks
the whole audio system, some others it works with sound glitches, lag and h=
eavy
CPU usage. On FreeBSD, I've been stayed away from this buggy bloatware: ALSA
works great! (yes, all my experiences with PA has been on Debian, and I don=
't
want to try it on FreeBSD)

- Pulseaudio is from the same author of SystemD and avahi... We all know wh=
at
people think about this guy, his behaviors and the way he thinks about
everything else...
I'm moving away from Debian to FreeBSD, and the first reason was because of=
 no
SystemD in FreeBSD. I don't want to have one of this software using all my
ressource on my OS. FreeBSD works perfectly as it is, with ALSA on my lapto=
p.

- I don't know anybody who would want pulseaudio on FreeBSD. If they want
poetterwares as default, there is Linux.

- DragonFlyBSD removed completely Pulseaudio from their ports:
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2016-August/313010.html
And that is a good thing.
Of course, I'm not asking PA to be removed from ports, having the choice to=
 use
it is great! But having it forced onto us isn't good at all.



I know I could recompile Chromium with Poudriere, I'm actually compiling a =
lot
of other packages to suit my needs. But compiling chromium alone take about=
 12h
on my computer (twice as long as all the others packages I have).
I just can't do it.

Maybe it would be better to add a second port named something like
"chromium-pulseaudio" with pulseaudio as default? And leave this "chromium"
port free of it.
There are already ports like nginx-full, nginx-lite, nginx-naxsi which are =
all
the same except for their default options.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216327-28929-DGz0PBrgTh>