Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 01:00:27 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ucd-snmp Makefile ports/net/ucd-snmp/patches patch-al patch-am patch-an Message-ID: <20000518010027.C19586@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <20000517185614.Q86725@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from billf@chc-chimes.com on Wed, May 17, 2000 at 06:56:14PM -0400 References: <200005172027.NAA89409@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000518005208.B19586@lucifer.bart.nl> <20000517185614.Q86725@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000518 00:58], Bill Fumerola (billf@chc-chimes.com) wrote: >On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 12:52:08AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >> > .. however, since no __FreeBSD_version bump was performed, I can't >> > handle this with the usual Makefile magic. >> >> I think a bump would be justified. > >Too much time passed, we can't retroactivly bump, it's a catch-22. That sucks then yeah. =\ But I thought it was pretty normal to bump the version when certain API's change, or does it need to be more earthshattering than that? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Sweet taste of vindication, It turns to ashes in your mouth... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000518010027.C19586>