Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 01:38:08 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Good name for a dump(8) option? Message-ID: <Mutt.19970202013808.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199702020003.KAA14891@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>; from Michael Smith on Feb 2, 1997 10:33:47 %2B1030 References: <Mutt.19970201144514.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199702020003.KAA14891@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Michael Smith wrote: > How about making it the default, I'll wait for a majority vote before doing this, since it will break the existing interface. Adding an option doesn't break it. > rather than a 300' 1600bpi 9-track > tape? What, you aren't using reel-to-reel tapes anymore? > Even _I_ turned mine into a stereo rack over a year ago, ... Abuse!!! :-)) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970202013808.j>