Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:11:50 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Coda on FreeBSD problem reports? Message-ID: <fn7eem$r6m$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080121203838.G4194@fledge.watson.org> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> <20080116085630.GA32361@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080117080359.U51764@fledge.watson.org> <20080118073445.GA30721@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080118095652.GC30721@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080118103952.D18977@fledge.watson.org> <20080118210621.GF7898@cs.cmu.edu> <20080118211556.T46437@fledge.watson.org> <20080119005938.Q53920@fledge.watson.org> <rmi63xn6yu9.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com> <20080121203838.G4194@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCCFBA18DB5F6156BCD49BDFA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Watson wrote: > I was looking at the NetBSD Coda parts over the weekend, but it seemed > that most of the bugs in the FreeBSD code were due to gradual rot as VF= S > evolved and our Coda module source didn't remain code up. I see a lot of CODA patches merged to RELENG_7_0 - can you write up a short overview of what is it's current state in FreeBSD - what works and what doesn't? --------------enigCCFBA18DB5F6156BCD49BDFA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHlz0WldnAQVacBcgRAs8sAKD23O6VkZ+4p/xfFBJLnMpRyOFtpACfaJZc 5J5MLnEhmX2pJXT9qMRTbEA= =SqpL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCCFBA18DB5F6156BCD49BDFA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fn7eem$r6m$1>