Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:17:43 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs fs/procfs Message-ID: <86od1oziig.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20081013133140.GQ7782@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> (Kostik Belousov's message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:31:40 %2B0300") References: <200810131300.m9DD0MaR076808@svn.freebsd.org> <20081013131047.GA84887@freebsd.org> <86skr0zlav.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20081013133140.GQ7782@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > what about commiting this to note this change? > > > + <para>A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed. Man= y Linux > > > + ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port.</= para> > > "A serious problem was fixed"? Really? And if none of that software > > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports? > I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes, > but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact. Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread Roman's proposed relnotes entry. Do you think it gives a correct impression of the nature and severity of the issue? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86od1oziig.fsf>