Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:05:26 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> To: kris@FreeBSD.org (Kris Kennaway) Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [spam score 6.00/10.0 -pobox] Re: [spam score 3.31/10.0 -pobox] Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fil.c ip_fil.h ip_input.c ip_ Message-ID: <200008011405.AAA06448@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007311431300.4370-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> from Kris Kennaway at "Jul 31, 0 02:33:04 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some email I received from Kris Kennaway, sie wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Darren Reed wrote: > > > Hey, I've given up trying to compile FreeBSD locally since it stopped > > working (my pcmcia card went from ~working in 3.X to not working in 4.X). > > So far, 2.2.8 is still the most reliable install I've used :-) I'm not > > sure it makes sense to continue to commit changes to that branch, however. > > That's why the FreeBSD project provides remote compilation resources > (build machines) for you to test on when you can't test locally - you're > expected to have compiled LINT prior to making intrusive commits to the > kernel, or not commit at all. Please see the committer's handbook. Which box is the "build box" ? For once I tried to do a "remote commit" (rather than from freefall, et al) but it appears to have had had some drawbacks. Having seen comments about "expect -current to be broken over the next X months", I'm not sure what the stink is all about. This isn't a commit to -STABLE, after all. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008011405.AAA06448>