Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:18:05 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Andrew Reilly" <andrew@areilly.bpc-users.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to compile nautilus with debug symbols from ports? Message-ID: <op.tkl2cf0n9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20061214085727.15bf3750@duncan.reilly.home> References: <20061214085727.15bf3750@duncan.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:57:27 -0600, Andrew Reilly = <andrew@areilly.bpc-users.org> wrote: > Hi there, > > I had nautilus crash on me, the other day. I think that I can > repeat the crash: well, it's happened twice, doing the same thing > (attempting a VFS mount of a file share from a Windows laptop > that requires authentication). So I installed bugbuddy so that > it could phone home to the GNOME folks to tell them what was up, > but although the _process_ seems to have worked, and a bug > registered, it wasn't able to find a core dump, and the core dump > wouldn't have had much useful symbolic info, anyway. > > So: what's happened to nautilus' .core file? Is there some fancy > clean-up mechanism going on? I imagine so: that must be how > bugbuddy gets invoked in the first place. Can this be overriden > so that I can get a core file to point gdb at? > > Secondly: is there a convenient port-build global knob for > turning on debugging symbols? Anything more complicated than > CFLAGS+=3D-g in /etc/make.conf? See in http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html#q3 for what to pu= t = in make.conf. Cheers, Mezz > Cheers, -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tkl2cf0n9aq2h7>