Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:44:26 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> Cc: Susanth K <susanthoffline@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The FreeBSD's Implementation Language Message-ID: <20070312003957.L72143@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <0AC8A2B3-E550-48E9-AC12-31CE361C9D7D@goldmark.org> References: <6faf55220703110951g63c92218p1b3865be3999047e@mail.gmail.com> <0AC8A2B3-E550-48E9-AC12-31CE361C9D7D@goldmark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> about FreeBSD (and possibly other systems)? > > It certainly seems that way to me. So from this point on, for any question for me it looks like writing well scored essay for computer lessons at school. it's very common on polish USENET on all computer groups, and it's clearly evident most cases that people don't really understand the question they ask. i don't state that it's Susanth case but it certainly looks this way. If not - why she don't ask about some available X CPU machines where X is amount of CPU she need. Of course assuming some type of CPU having known computing power. If so - she should specify what kind of task she would like to perform on that machine. With such question there will be possible answers like "this should be OK for that job" or not.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070312003957.L72143>