Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 15:17:05 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu (David E. Cross) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2-RELENG vs. 2.2.2-RELEASE Message-ID: <199707110547.PAA22745@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970710182405.20702A-100000@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> from "David E. Cross" at "Jul 10, 97 06:25:39 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David E. Cross stands accused of saying: > I asked in -questions and #freebsd but got no answer. Thought I would try > here. > > Can 2.2-RELENG be assumed as stable as 2.2.2-RELEASE. Generally, more so. > (I am looking to upgrade from 2.2.1-RELEASE mostly to get rid of the libXt > security holes.) Huh? Apart from the fact that AFAIK the Xt holes were fixed ages ago, libXt isn't a part of FreeBSD. It's a part of XFree86, which is a separate distribution. You can upgrade this without having to change the base system at all. > David Cross -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707110547.PAA22745>