Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:03 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Ports system quality
Message-ID:  <4E5B83F3.3050506@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1314604521.82067.461.camel@xenon>
References:  <4E5A48AC.6050201@eskk.nu> <20058.20743.791783.342355@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <BLU0-SMTP182102B9C96837517ECB6BB93150@phx.gbl> <20110828172651.GB277@magic.hamla.org> <20110828173059.GT17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110828181356.GD277@magic.hamla.org> <20110828183300.GX17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110828184542.GE277@magic.hamla.org> <20110828152234.54cc9fac@seibercom.net> <20110828193046.GA668@magic.hamla.org> <1314564889.82067.89.camel@xenon> <4E5AB672.4020607@FreeBSD.org> <1314585798.82067.338.camel@xenon> <4E5B0EFB.6000900@FreeBSD.org> <1314596096.82067.419.camel@xenon> <4E5B320E.8010503@FreeBSD.org> <1314601622.82067.441.camel@xenon> <4E5B3CF8.4020805@FreeBSD.org> <1314604521.82067.461.camel@xenon>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 29/08/2011 10:55 Michal Varga said the following:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 00:17 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> are unlikely to ever get to that point. I would also point out that from
>> a project management standpoint developers rarely make good QA people.
>> To do this right you really would want separate teams.
> 
> As I said, that's not something that's in my power to change.
> 
> In any case, it just leads (and always will lead) only to this outcome:
> 
>> Those are good alternatives as well. I use FreeBSD as my desktop, but
>> it's painful, and I wouldn't do it at all if I didn't need to.
> 
> Other OSes/projects, for some reason, are able to manage their
> maintainer base to much better results, and it shows. It can either be
> done here too, or the situation can be ignored for another five, ten
> years, until FreeBSD fades into obscurity, eventually getting known only
> as 'that OS where nothing works'. It's an issue that won't go away on
> its own.

Correct.
So what's your personal contribution towards fixing that issue?
E.g. finding out how "other OSes/projects, for some reason, are able to manage
their maintainer base to much better results" and teaching that to us would be a
great contribution.  There are many other ways to contribute as well.


-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5B83F3.3050506>