Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:26:17 +0200
From:      Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
To:        George Kouryachy <frbrgeorge@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ports version upping policy?
Message-ID:  <1113305177.764.23.camel@innercity>
In-Reply-To: <f6879d2c05041204121b11d319@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <f6879d2c05041204121b11d319@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-KAJ+/7Zy82RYZbFqs8qW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le Mardi 12 avril 2005 =E0 15:12 +0400, George Kouryachy a =E9crit :
> Hi.
>=20
> I've noticed some ports I'm using are too outdated against the upstream
> E. g. python Toy Parseg Generatior (tpg) port is still 3.0.0, although
> there is 3.0.5 with many bugfixes.
>=20
> Another example is tardy (tarball on-the-fly editor). It just ups from
> 1.11 to 1.12, but the new version has many changes and meanwhile the
> author switched it's website.
>=20
> The Q are:
> 1. I have stable new-versioned ports edited by myself. Can I push it
> to main ports tree instead of rewriting my own one after every cvs
> update?

	You need to have write-access to the ports tree, so for now,
	that's not (yet) possible.

> 2. I wrote a letter to every port maintainer picking their emails
> directly from pkg-info, but got no answer. Was there a wrong style of
> request? Maybe it's better to write to some maillists or use PR? There
> are no patches needed to compile the new ports and there a no "stable"
> and "unstable" versions of tardy and tpg, so there seems to be lack of
> maintainer's care not the lack of maintainers time...

	People can be busy with life and not thinking about their ports=20
	all the time. Use send-pr to send your patches. Follow the=20
	instructions written in the Porter's Handbook.

> 3. tardy maintainer is "ports@freebsd.org". Does it mean the port is
> unmaintained?

	Yes, I've asked Dan Langille to add a special notice for these=20
	ports so that people know they are unmaintained. Maybe we should
	think about it again. Dan ?

--=20
Florent Thoumie
flz@xbsd.org

--=-KAJ+/7Zy82RYZbFqs8qW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCW7BZMxEkbVFH3PQRAi0SAJ9c8Gu6Ubzw+Mcv5jZZ/9a5prqnpgCeKjLr
l+88VD65P7f9fdjm8TD2JV8=
=HzlZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-KAJ+/7Zy82RYZbFqs8qW--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1113305177.764.23.camel>