Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 19:13:01 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@calcaphon.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys bus.h bus_private.h src/sys/kern subr_bus.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031911020.21619-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <7508.962645846@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Yes. Hotplug is serious. Just how it is implemented is in question > >here. Do you have the model where the kernel tries to keep this > >information persistant, or to you force a userland program to deal. > >And if you do, then what do you do in the interrum between when the > >device disappears and it is back and configured... > > Maybe we should vector around arch@ for some opinions on this ? Possibly adding a good example or two for both cases in the initial message to avoid noise from people that are not familiar with requirements for high-availability? Nick -- n_hibma@webweaving.org n_hibma@freebsd.org USB project http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031911020.21619-100000>