Date: 16 Jul 2002 19:27:38 -0600 From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: John Angelmo <john@veidit.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, john@jnielsen.net Subject: Re: Still no XFree86-4? Message-ID: <1026869258.474.103.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <1026861953.474.18.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> References: <3D33EFC5.7010407@veidit.net> <1026861953.474.18.camel@anholt.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:25, Eric Anholt wrote: > As far as the Wraphelp.c issues, I'm working on cleaning that mess up > right now (testing the patch on a full XFree86-4 build on clean > -current). I've put the patch up at http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/files/x420diff2-1 It does the following: - Make me maintainer of imake-4 port. It's very much a part of the X-4 build, and was supposed to be in the take-over-maintainership commit. - Make the X-4 miniports use imake-4's HasXdmAuth setting (the use-Wraphelp.c option) and copy Wraphelp.c (unconditionally). - Adds USE_PERL5 to imake-4 because perl's required for the install of it. This will also cover perl dependencies for the rest of the X-4. - Rewords some of the comments in XFree86-4-*/scripts/configure. It notably doesn't include md5summing of Wraphelp.c. If I can find what's the 'best' Wraphelp.c (and most legal? What's the status of wraphelp importing/exporting?), I'll switch it. Is there any circumstance when someone wouldn't have access to Wraphelp.c? If this works for other people, I'll work on getting it committed. -- Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1026869258.474.103.camel>